Open Access
The Privatization of Military and Security Services and the Limits of Contract Law
Loading...
Files
MWP_2010_31.pdf (519.39 KB)
MWP 2010/31
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1830-7728
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI MWP;2010/31
Cite
CALDERAI, Valentina, The Privatization of Military and Security Services and the Limits of Contract Law, EUI MWP;2010/31 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/14558
Abstract
A growing body of literature has focused in recent years on the potentialities for market mechanisms to improve the enforcement of international human rights law against the breaches committed by private military and security companies (“PMSCs”) employed by sovereign entities. Yet, of all the avenues known by the law of contract to increase the degree of compliance with international law, none is ever included in the contracts between the States and PMSCs. This paper gives an account of this reluctancy on the part of the States, based on a survey of the contracts concluded by the U.S. administration during the first stage of the Iraq occupation and the comparative analysis of public and private organizations. In contrast to domestic outsourcing, the provision of military force takes place in conditions of high bilateral dependency, social embeddedness, specific contractual hazards, that taken together deter from traditional methods of contract enforcement (litigation and arbitration) and emphasize mechanisms based on reputational mechanisms and hierarchy . These limitations should be attentively considered in shaping the role of contract standardization into a comprehensive regulatory strategy at national and international level.