Open Access
The dual role of Iran’s National Information Network : a primer
avs request failed
Loading...
Files
Dual_role_2025.pdf (1.76 MB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI; RSC; [Global Governance Programme]; GIFI; Issue Brief; 2025
Cite
NOROUZ POUR, Hesam, The dual role of Iran’s National Information Network : a primer, EUI, RSC, [Global Governance Programme], GIFI, Issue Brief, 2025 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/94070
Abstract
The pervasive influence of the internet continues to reshape communication, economic activity, and political engagement across the globe. Its expansion has also ignited a profound debate regarding its governance, pitting visions of an open, globally connected network against models emphasising national control and sovereignty. This tension is nowhere more evident than in the development and implementation of Iran’s National Information Network (NIN). Originally framed as a project for enhancing domestic connectivity, fostering local content, and ensuring digital sovereignty, the NIN has, over the years, played a central role in enabling the Iranian government to impose systemic information restrictions, particularly during crises such as the 2019 protests, the 2022 Mahsa Amini uprising, and most recently, the internet shutdowns and censorship measures during the 2025 war with Israel. It is widely criticised by human rights organisations1 as a powerful infrastructure for state surveillance, censorship, and control over the flow of information, particularly during periods of dissent. This brief dissects this duality. It analyses the complex role of NIN, evaluating its purported contributions to internet access and digital development alongside its documented functions as a tool for government suppression. Furthermore, it examines the relationship between the NIN’s architecture and operational reality and the core commitments made by governments in international commitments such as the Global Digital Compact.2 This brief contends that while the NIN has facilitated the expansion of certain domestic digital infrastructures, its fundamental design and practical implementation prioritise state control and information management, placing it in direct opposition to the foundational principles of a free, open, and rights-centric global internet.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: November 2025