Open Access
Machiavelli's passions
Loading...
Files
IHRFaini_MachiavelliPassionsPP.pdf (565.07 KB)
Embargoed until 2018, Post-print version
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1749-6977; 1749-6985
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
The intellectual history review, 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 203-221
Cite
FAINI, Matteo, Machiavelli’s passions, The intellectual history review, 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 203-221 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/46105
Abstract
In his years as Florentine Secretary, Machiavelli repeatedly faced the problem of interpreting the gestures and words of statesmen that were masters of deception. The strategy he developed to uncover these statesmen’s intentions was based on the analysis of human passions, on uncovering the fundamental trait that defined a man’s character. I apply Machiavelli’s strategy of interpretation to Machiavelli himself and uncover the irreconcilable disconnect which shaped his personal tragedy. On one hand, he related to his objects of desire by entirely abandoning himself to them, regardless of how unachievable they were. On the other, to obtain these objects of desire his analytical mind developed strategies which took pride in their adherence to what he called the “effectual truth of the matter.” His incapacity to reconsider his objectives in light of the means at his disposal and his tendency to transfer all of himself into his objectives determined Machiavelli’s successes and failures. He repeatedly failed when he had to set his own goals, or when he approached a problem with empathy. He succeeded when he was given precise and limited objectives and when he understood that he did not share the goals of those he was studying.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 27 Mar 2017