Is the left-right scale a valid measure of ideology? : individual-level variation in associations with 'left' and 'right' and left-right self-placement
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0190-9320; 1573-6687
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
Political behavior, 2017, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 553–583
Cite
BAUER, Paul C., BARBERÁ, Pablo, ACKERMANN, Kathrin, VENETZ, Aaron, Is the left-right scale a valid measure of ideology? : individual-level variation in associations with ‘left’ and ‘right’ and left-right self-placement, Political behavior, 2017, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 553–583 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/46488
Abstract
In order to measure ideology, political scientists heavily rely on the so-called left-right scale. Left and right are, however, abstract political concepts and may trigger different associations among respondents. If these associations vary systematically with other variables this may induce bias in the empirical study of ideology. We illustrate this problem using a unique survey that asked respondents open-ended questions regarding the meanings they attribute to the concepts “left” and “right”. We assess and categorize this textual data using topic modeling techniques. Our analysis shows that variation in respondents’ associations is systematically related to their self-placement on the left-right scale and also to variables such as education and respondents’ cultural background (East vs. West Germany). Our findings indicate that the interpersonal comparability of the left-right scale across individuals is impaired. More generally, our study suggests that we need more research on how respondents interpret various abstract concepts that we regularly use in survey questions.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
First Online: 13 October 2016