Publication
Open Access

Shaping Virtuous Friendship: the Jesuit Matteo Ricci (1552-1610) in late Ming China

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
License
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1830-7728
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
EUI MWP; 2011/25
Cite
HOSNE, Ana Carolina, Shaping Virtuous Friendship: the Jesuit Matteo Ricci (1552-1610) in late Ming China, EUI MWP, 2011/25 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/18639
Abstract
Taking as a starting point his first treatise in Chinese, ‘On Friendship’ (Jiaoyou lun, 1595), this paper aims to analyze the process by which the Italian Jesuit Matteo Ricci (1583-1610) shaped the concept of virtuous friendship in late Ming China, specifically among the Confucian literati. ‘On Friendship’ is a treatise that reflects and is part of the Renaissance and humanist culture brought to China. It is, in part, a translation into Chinese of maxims by authors such as Aristotle, Cicero, Seneca, Plutarch, Herodotus, Augustine and Ambrose, juxtaposed with ideas derived from the Confucian tradition, especially those on virtuous friendship. In recent years, cultural historians have begun to recognize how important friendship was as a topic of great interest to late Ming intellectuals, which suggests that Ricci was attempting to participate in, and to benefit from, a discussion that was already taking place in China. This paper aims at analyzing the way Ricci shaped virtuous friendship in his Jiaoyou lun by taking both paths, the European and the Chinese, but also focusing on the more or less ‘winding’ nature of these paths. Indeed, Ricci´s treatise was nurtured from different sources, which in turn implied selections and omissions. In a first section I address the less problematic aspect of Ricci´s Jiaoyou lun: its humanistic hue; in a second section I focus on the adaptation to – but also the manipulation of – Confucian values and precepts; in a third section I address a key – and debatable – aspect, that is, the idea of Ricci´s treatise as ‘secular’. Last but not least, a fourth section is dedicated to concluding remarks.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
External Links
Publisher
Version
Research Projects
Sponsorship and Funder Information