Open Access
A qualitative assessment of QCA : method stretching in large-N studies and temporality
Loading...
Files
Finn-2022-Quality_&_Quantity.pdf (766.78 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0033-5177; 1573-7845
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Quality and quantity, 2022, Vol. 56, pp. 3815–3830
Cite
FINN, Victoria, A qualitative assessment of QCA : method stretching in large-N studies and temporality, Quality and quantity, 2022, Vol. 56, pp. 3815–3830 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/73547
Abstract
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a descriptive research method that can provide causal explanations for an outcome of interest. Despite extensive quantitative assessments of the method, my objective is to contribute to the scholarly discussion with insights constructed through a qualitative lens. Researchers using the QCA approach have less ability to incorporate and nuance information on set membership as the number of cases grows. While recognizing the suggested ways to overcome such challenges, I argue that since setting criteria for membership, calibrating, and categorizing are crucial QCA aspects that require in-depth knowledge, QCA is unfit for larger-N studies. Additionally, I also discuss that while the method is able to identify various parts of a causal configuration—the ‘what’—it falls short to shed light on the ‘how’ and ‘why,’ especially when temporality matters. Researchers can complement it with other methods, such as process tracing and case studies, to fill in these missing explanatory pieces or clarify contradictions—which begs the question of why they would also choose to use QCA.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 06 January 2022