Distributed energy resources and electricity balancing : visions for future organisation

SCHITTEKATTE, Tim; POTOTSCHNIG, Alberto

doi:10.2870/95157

Distributed energy resources and electricity balancing : visions for future organisation

dc.contributor.author	SCHITTEKATTE, Tim
dc.contributor.author	POTOTSCHNIG, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned	2022-02-25T08:36:27Z
dc.date.available	2022-02-25T08:36:27Z
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.description.abstract	This Report discusses how electricity balancing may best be organised in a future with greater penetration of distributed energy resources (DERs). Increased DER penetration can pose challenges to electricity balancing, while, at the same time, DERs can also help to balance the system more cost-effectively. Currently, participation by DERs in electricity balancing markets, whether individually or aggregated, is still somewhat limited. In the debate among practitioners and academics, most attention has been devoted to reducing market entry barriers for DERs. In this Report, we go one step further: we analyse whether the current organisation of the balancing mechanism is future-proof. This Report comprises an introduction, four sections and conclusions. After the introduction, Section 2 explains the working of the balancing mechanism and introduces the relevant EU legislation. Section 3 shows that the current organisation of balancing mechanisms in the EU is a legacy rather than a well-thought-through design choice. We explain that alternative setups are possible in theory and that their performance in practice depends on the context. To assess different balancing setups, we introduce a multidimensional framework and illustrate it by comparing the current setups in the EU and the US. In Section 4, we highlight the challenges that the balancing mechanism in the EU is currently facing with increasing shares of DERs. We argue that, in the medium to long term, it will become increasingly challenging to operate the balancing mechanism cost-effectively without adjusting its organisation. In Section 5, we introduce two alternative ways of organising it in the future: the ‘Super SO model’ and the ‘Local SO model’. The key question is whether it would be easier to manage seams within a balancing area or seams between balancing areas. The main challenge with the Super SO model would be that a global optimum, considering all voltage levels and local issues, is difficult to achieve. Even though the Local SO model might be more pragmatic, the main challenge with this model would be implementing it in a way that limits fragmentation of balancing markets, which would have severe implications for efficiency and competition.	en
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.2870/95157
dc.identifier.isbn	9789294661821
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/1814/74246
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.orcid.upload	TRUE	*
dc.publisher	European University Institute	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Florence School of Regulation	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	2022/02	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	[Energy]	en
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	en
dc.rights.license	Attribution 4.0 International	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Distributed energy resources	en
dc.subject	Electricity balancing markets	en
dc.subject	Power market design	en
dc.subject	Power market regulation	en
dc.subject	Power systems governance	en
dc.subject	Distribution system operator	en
dc.subject	Energy communities	en
dc.title	Distributed energy resources and electricity balancing : visions for future organisation	en
dc.type	Technical Report	en
dspace.entity.type	Publication
eui.subscribe.skip	true
person.identifier.orcid	0000-0002-7196-0231
person.identifier.orcid	0000-0002-2386-0113
person.identifier.other	39547
person.identifier.other	32813
relation.isAuthorOfPublication	57960b5a-88e2-47cb-b97d-3f6202b8a892
relation.isAuthorOfPublication	2812e441-a532-4e51-a8ac-61e8c74ae073
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery	57960b5a-88e2-47cb-b97d-3f6202b8a892