Judicial Review of UN Counter-Terrorism Sanctions in the European Multilevel System of Human Rights Protection: A case study in ineffectiveness
Loading...
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Filippo FONTANELLI, Giuseppe MARTINICO and Paolo CARROZZA (eds), Shaping Rule of Law through Dialogue: International and supranational experiences, Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2010, 147-190
Cite
FABBRINI, Federico, Judicial Review of UN Counter-Terrorism Sanctions in the European Multilevel System of Human Rights Protection: A case study in ineffectiveness, in Filippo FONTANELLI, Giuseppe MARTINICO and Paolo CARROZZA (eds), Shaping Rule of Law through Dialogue: International and supranational experiences, Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2010, 147-190 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/21798
Abstract
The chapter analyzes the evolution in the case law of the EU judiciary in the field of counter-terrorism. It explains how the initial self-restraint of the CFI in Kadi produced a problem of ineffectiveness in the protection of due process rights and how the subsequent revirement of the ECJ in Kadi represented a satisfactory response to the lack of judicial protection.