Open Access
Welfare, Resources, and Luck-Egalitarianism
Loading...
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1725-6739
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI LAW; 2007/05
Cite
SADURSKI, Wojciech, Welfare, Resources, and Luck-Egalitarianism, EUI LAW, 2007/05 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/6712
Abstract
The leading discourse about luck egalitarianism has been informed by the distinction
between equality of welfare and equality of resources. This paper attempts to illuminate its
significance by focusing on the status of individual preferences (in particular, preferences
which are particularly costly to satisfy) as regards egalitarian distribution. It then considers
another distinction: that between “persons” and “circumstances” to see how it correlates
with the central moral intuition which triggers the egalitarian approach, namely that social
inequalities should be allowed to reflect the choices people make in the course of their
lives. I argue that if we consistently maintain the centrality of choice for the whole theory,
and construct the technical concept of “resources” accordingly, we may well realize that the
gap between “equality of welfare” and “equality of resources” is not as wide as many
theorists of luck egalitarianism would have us believe. Finally, I address head-on the crucial
issue lying in the background of this whole discussion: is the aspiration to eliminate
systemically the impact of bad luck egalitarian? Against many critics of luck-egalitarianism, I
claim that it is, but only contingently rather than inherently and necessarily