Open Access
Book review : the rule of the least imperfect : a review of Despoina Mantzari 'Courts, regulators, and the scrutiny of economic evidence' (Oxford University Press 2022)
Loading...
Files
EJLS_2024_16_1_Unekbas.pdf (110.58 KB)
Full-text in Open Access, Published version
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1973-2937
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
European journal of legal studies, 2024, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 147-154
Cite
ÜNEKBAŞ, Selçukhan, Book review : the rule of the least imperfect : a review of Despoina Mantzari ‘Courts, regulators, and the scrutiny of economic evidence’ (Oxford University Press 2022), European journal of legal studies, 2024, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 147-154 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/76927
Abstract
In this timely book, Dr. Despoina Mantzari tackles a prominent question in regulation: how do generalist courts handle the decisions of specialist decision-makers? Markets require decision-makers to engage with expert knowledge. While regulators are institutionally structured to handle this task, the same cannot be said about generalist courts. As Mantzari puts it, there is an 'epistemic asymmetry' between courts and regulators in tackling complex economic matters. As such, judicial control presents many challenges for the error-correction function of adjudication. The book exposes and addresses these challenges by analyzing regulatory decisions and the corresponding systems of judicial review in the utilities sector. The book essentially claims that 'the least imperfect' institution should interpret and decide on economic evidence, turning the question into one of relative institutional competencies. Unless a specialist court is established, expert agencies are generally better-situated ('less imperfect') to analyze economic evidence. In such a setting, generalist courts ensure legality of decisions by assessing whether regulators conform to principles of rationality or due process.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 10 June 2024