Open Access
A little learning is a dangerous thing : AG Emiliou on the Adequate Minimum Wages Directive (C-19/23, Opinion of 14 January 2025)
Loading...
Files
LAW_2025_02.pdf (401.02 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1725-6739
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI; LAW; Working Paper; 2025/02
Cite
KILPATRICK, Claire, STEIERT, Marc, A little learning is a dangerous thing : AG Emiliou on the Adequate Minimum Wages Directive (C-19/23, Opinion of 14 January 2025), EUI, LAW, Working Paper, 2025/02 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/77887
Abstract
Advocate General Emiliou has delivered an inadequate Opinion on the Adequate Minimum Wages Directive 2022/2041/EU. Following a Danish request to annul this Directive, the Advocate General’s Opinion proposes its full annulment based on a historically mistaken and overly extended understanding of the competence exclusion on pay in Art 153(5) TFEU set against a baffling presentation of Social Europe. In this working paper, we first challenge the AG’s understanding of the pay competence exclusion which led him to recommend full annulment to the Court of Justice. This includes pointing out that, on one hand, the drafting history of Art 153 TFEU underlines an uncertain, therefore narrow exclusion of pay from EU competence. On the other hand, we place the Opinion in the context of the EU’s earlier labour law and the Court’s case-law to show the many EU legal instruments that regulate pay already in a way which the Advocate General would consider prohibited under Art 153(5) TFEU, and to emphasise the Court’s insistence on a narrow pay competence exclusion. We then consider the Advocate General’s inadequate depiction of EU social law around the Adequate Minimum Wages Directive which provided the wrong context for his reasoning on the annulment action. The Court of Justice is entirely free not to follow the Opinion in its reasoning, in its knowledge and in its outcome. The pay competence exclusion in Art 153(5) TFEU should be interpreted narrowly and, therefore, the Adequate Minimum Wages Directive’s legal basis maintained.