Open Access
It will be what we want it to be : sociotechnical and contested systemic risk at the core of the EU's regulation of platforms' AI systems
Loading...
Files
Will_be_2025.pdf (1.15 MB)
Full-text in Open Access, Published version
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
2190-3387
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law, 2025, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 35-72, OnlineOnly
Cite
CORREIA DE CARVALHO, Mateus, It will be what we want it to be : sociotechnical and contested systemic risk at the core of the EU’s regulation of platforms’ AI systems, Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law, 2025, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 35-72, OnlineOnly - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/78255
Abstract
The EU regulates AI systems of large digital platforms using a risk-based approach developed primarily through the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the AI Act (AIA). The existing literature highlights two main challenges to this regulatory strategy: the potentially unconstrained discretion and in-formational power of regulated tech companies, and the limited predictive value of risk regulation for less quantifiable forms of harm. This paper describes and systematises how EU law intends to address these challenges and ensure effective AI risk management processes. Through doctrinal analysis of the DSA, AIA, and their implementing laws and soft law, it lays out the integrated risk management framework these regulations establish for platforms’ AI systems. It argues that this integrated framework has three main normative commitments: (i) AI systemic risks should be framed sociotechnically, (ii) their management should be methodologically contextual, and (iii) civil society should be actively involved in identifying and mitigating AI systemic risks. On this last commitment, however, the mechanisms for civil society participation remain especially unclear. This paper thus offers an overview of all formal and informal spaces of participation in this risk management framework, differentiating them by their institutional setup, rationales for civil society intervention, types of expertise sought, and actors involved. Overall, this paper advances the dialogue on the EU’s risk-based approach to platform and AI regulation, offering a possible baseline for critique and empirical inquiry into its implementation.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 26 March 2025