Open Access
Does radical-right success make the political debate more negative? : evidence from emotional rhetoric in German state parliaments
Loading...
Files
VALENTIM_WIEDMANN_2021.pdf (2.01 MB)
Full-text in Open Access. Published version.
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0190-9320; 1573-6687
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Political behavior, 2023, Vol. 45, pp. 243-264
Cite
VALENTIM, Vicente, WIDMANN, Tobias, Does radical-right success make the political debate more negative? : evidence from emotional rhetoric in German state parliaments, Political behavior, 2023, Vol. 45, pp. 243-264 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/70695
Abstract
Political rhetoric has important effects on the quality of democracy, but we know very little about what causes variation in the tone of the political debate. We investigate how radical-right success affects the way the remaining politicians discuss political issues. Using an original dictionary, we measure different positive and negative emotions in a newly collected dataset of speeches in German state parliaments. Taking advantage of variation in the timing of elections when radical-right politicians enter these parliaments, we find that politicians of other parties respond to radical-right success by using more positive, instead of negative, emotions. The analyses suggest that this finding may be the result of a strategy by the remaining politicians to distance themselves from radical-right discourse. Our findings highlight how radical-right success can create incentives for other politicians to enforce democratic norms that radical-right politicians breach.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
First published online: 24 March 2021
External Links
Publisher
Version
Research Projects
Sponsorship and Funder Information
This article was published Open Access with the support from the EUI Library through the CRUI - Springer Transformative Agreement (2020-2024)