Article 103 of the UN Charter : strict hierarchy as a last resort

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLEISS, Johann Ruben
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-21T08:55:05Z
dc.date.available2013-03-21T08:55:05Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.descriptionSupervisor: Professor Marise Cremona, European University Institute.
dc.descriptionAward date: 26 November 2012en
dc.descriptionPDF of thesis uploaded from the Library digital archive of EUI PhD thesesen
dc.description.abstractDue to the growing proliferation and specialisation of international law and its actors, on the one hand, and the rising activities of the UN Security Council, on the other, the risk for possible conflicts of UN law with other law increased strongly. This prompted debates on a hierarchical nature of the Charter and in particular it’s Article 103 which deals with conflicts between UN law and other international law. This thesis—after introducing the theoretical background of the concept of hierarchy and linking Article 103 to the discussion on hierarchy in international law in the light of the broader discourse on pluralism versus constitutionalism—analyzes Article 103 on the basis of a pragmatic interpretative approach. In light of various judgments that dealt with possible conflicts between UN law and other law techniques will be discussed that enable Courts that have different concepts of the international legal order to avoid possible conflicts. This thesis argues that the real value of Article 103 is the one of an interpretative guideline that unfolds supremacy of UN law by dialogue and accommodation rather than by hierarchy in a strict sense. Article 103 should be applied as a hierarchical rule—in the strict sense—only as a ‘last resort’ once all possible venues of harmonious interpretation are exhausted. By such an approach Article 103 is more likely to maintain the coherence and the unity of the international legal system under the umbrella of the UN Charter However, when it comes to the limits of harmonious interpretation, in cases of so-called genuine conflicts, UN law should be granted hierarchical supremacy on the international level; international and domestic Courts should exercise judicial restraint—but only under similar conditions to the ones that were formulated in the Solange approach by the German BVerfG or the Bosphorus approach by the ECtHR.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationFlorence : European University Institute, 2012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/26374
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUIen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLLM Thesisen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subject.lcshInternational law -- European Union countries
dc.subject.lcshConflict of laws -- International Law
dc.titleArticle 103 of the UN Charter : strict hierarchy as a last resorten
dc.typeThesisen
dspace.entity.typePublication
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Leiss_2012.pdf
Size:
1.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
PDF in Restricted Access
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
LAW LLM Theses