Open Access
Constitutional pluralism as political driver for multipolar re-ordering of international legal systems
Loading...
Files
LAW_2025_06.pdf (458.31 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1725-6739
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI; LAW; Working Paper; 2025/06
Cite
PETERSMANN, Ernst-Ulrich, Constitutional pluralism as political driver for multipolar re-ordering of international legal systems, EUI, LAW, Working Paper, 2025/06 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/92846
Abstract
Systems theories emphasize the evolution of legal systems through dynamic interactions between rules, governance institutions, legal practices and ‘lawfare’ challenging pathdependent principles. The UN and WTO legal systems had been designed by and for democracies with market economies. The accession of state-capitalist countries to the WTO, wars of aggression violating UN law, trade wars disrupting the WTO legal system, military aggression among WTO members, climate change and global health pandemics challenge foundational rules and principles of UN and WTO law. Constitutional theories explain why ‘governance failures’ are often made possible by constitutionally unconstrained power monopolies in authoritarian states and executive abuses of foreign policy discretion under national Constitutions (like ‘emergency governance’ through ‘presidential orders’ of President Trump); multilevel constitutional constraints can protect ‘strict observance of international law’ as prescribed in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union. The article explores how diverse constitutions drive diverse ‘international legal policies.’ It elaborates ten propositions explaining legal practices driving geopolitical rivalries. Countermeasures responding to authoritarian and neoliberal violations of multilateral treaty systems promote dialectic processes clarifying (e.g. by judicial treaty interpretations) and transforming international legal systems (e.g. through plurilateral agreements on WTO interim arbitration procedures, carbon border adjustment measures aimed at higher carbon reduction commitments complementing the Paris Agreement on Climate Change Mitigation, unilateral security measures).