A comparison of direct and iterated multistep AR methods for forecasting macroeconomic time series
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0304-4076
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
Journal of econometrics, 2006, Vol. 135, No. 1-2, pp. 499-526
Cite
MARCELLINO, Massimiliano, STOCK, James H., WATSON, Mark W., A comparison of direct and iterated multistep AR methods for forecasting macroeconomic time series, Journal of econometrics, 2006, Vol. 135, No. 1-2, pp. 499-526 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/42713
Abstract
“Iterated” multiperiod-ahead time series forecasts are made using a one-period ahead model, iterated forward for the desired number of periods, whereas “direct” forecasts are made using a horizon-specific estimated model, where the dependent variable is the multiperiod ahead value being forecasted. Which approach is better is an empirical matter: in theory, iterated forecasts are more efficient if the one-period ahead model is correctly specified, but direct forecasts are more robust to model misspecification. This paper compares empirical iterated and direct forecasts from linear univariate and bivariate models by applying simulated out-of-sample methods to 170 U.S. monthly macroeconomic time series spanning 1959–2002. The iterated forecasts typically outperform the direct forecasts, particularly, if the models can select long-lag specifications. The relative performance of the iterated forecasts improves with the forecast horizon.