Open Access
Judicial independence and impartiality : tenure changes at the European Court of human rights
Loading...
Files
Judicial_Independence_and_Impartiality_Art_2023.pdf (786.9 KB)
Embargoed until 2024, Final Accepted Version
License
Access Rights
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0938-5428; 1464-3596
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
European journal of international law, 2023, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 581-614
Cite
MOLBÆK-STEENSIG, Helga, QUEMY, Alexandre, Judicial independence and impartiality : tenure changes at the European Court of human rights, European journal of international law, 2023, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 581-614 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75973
Abstract
Judges should be impartial and independent, judging based solely on the law. Current constitutional literature suggests an important factor in securing this may be the length of tenure. The assumption is that judges with non-renewable terms are more independent than judges with renewable terms since they do not have to worry about reappointment, but proving this assumption empirically is not straightforward. Obstacles include difficulties in comparing different courts and the fact that there is often no obvious case outcome that proves independence. This article aims to overcome these obstacles with a mixed-methods study on the European Court of Human Rights during a time when the tenure rules changed. The study goes beyond the counting of votes and analyses the arguments used in separate opinions as indicators of independence. Our main findings are that, after the introduction of non-renewable terms, judges write more opinions overall, and more of them criticize the judges’ appointing states, while fewer defend it. We also find that judges on non-renewable terms are on average more likely to write opinions addressing violations as systemic problems and to use their opinions to provide guidance for their appointing states on implementing judgments and improving human rights protection.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 24 August 2023