Open Access
Håndhevelse og legitimitet : en integrativ vurdering av Parisavtalens effektivitet
Loading...
Files
Vegard_2018.pdf (1.82 MB)
Full-text in Open Access, published version
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1891-1757
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Internasjonal politikk, 2018, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 47-72
Cite
TØRSTAD, Vegard, Håndhevelse og legitimitet : en integrativ vurdering av Parisavtalens effektivitet, Internasjonal politikk, 2018, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 47-72 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/54024
Abstract
Denne artikkelen drøfter hvilke kriterier som er relevante for å måle klimaavtalers effektivitet, og evaluerer Parisavtalen i lys av disse. Tilnærmingsmåten er både deduktiv og induktiv, i den forstand at artikkelen både drøfter hva eksisterende teori kan fortelle om effektiviteten til Parisavtalen – og samtidig bruker Parisavtalen som et referansepunkt for å utvide det eksisterende analyseapparatet på klimaavtalers effektivitet. I motsetning til mye av det som så langt har blitt hevdet om prospektene til Parisavtalen, argumenterer denne artikkelen for at utsiktene for avtalens effektivitet er lovende på nåværende tidspunkt. Det er hovedsakelig tre grunner til det. For det første nyter avtalen bred støtte og deltakelse. For det andre er avtalen relativt ambisiøs. For det tredje sender avtalen tydelige signaler om universalitet, endrede økonomiske incentiver og viktigheten av ikke-statlige aktører, noe som kan bidra til at dens implementering fasiliteres.
This article discusses which criteria are relevant for measuring the effectiveness of climate agreements, and evaluates the Paris Agreement in light of these. The approach is both deductive and inductive, in the sense that the article discusses both what existing theory can tell us about the effectiveness of the Agreement, but also how the Agreement can be used as basis for expanding existing theoretical approaches for evaluating the effectiveness of climate agreements. In contrast to much that so far has been said about the prospects of the Paris Agreement, this article argues that the outlook for the effectiveness of the Agreement is currently positive. There are mainly three reasons for this. Firstly, the Agreement enjoys broad support and participation. Secondly, the Agreement is relatively ambitious. Thirdly, the Agreement sends firm signals about universality, changed economic incentives and the importance of nonstate actors, which can contribute to facilitation of its implementation burden.
This article discusses which criteria are relevant for measuring the effectiveness of climate agreements, and evaluates the Paris Agreement in light of these. The approach is both deductive and inductive, in the sense that the article discusses both what existing theory can tell us about the effectiveness of the Agreement, but also how the Agreement can be used as basis for expanding existing theoretical approaches for evaluating the effectiveness of climate agreements. In contrast to much that so far has been said about the prospects of the Paris Agreement, this article argues that the outlook for the effectiveness of the Agreement is currently positive. There are mainly three reasons for this. Firstly, the Agreement enjoys broad support and participation. Secondly, the Agreement is relatively ambitious. Thirdly, the Agreement sends firm signals about universality, changed economic incentives and the importance of nonstate actors, which can contribute to facilitation of its implementation burden.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
First published online: 20 April 2018
Under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)
Under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)