Embargoed Access
Labour as labour : exploring an employment model of regulation for commercial surrogacy
Loading...
Files
Embargoed until 2026
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Florence : European University Institute, 2022
EUI; LAW; PhD Thesis
Cite
TAYLOR ARMSTRONG, Sylvie Grace, Labour as labour : exploring an employment model of regulation for commercial surrogacy, Florence : European University Institute, 2022, EUI, LAW, PhD Thesis - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/75191
Abstract
Commercial surrogacy continues to grow in popularity. Lack of legal provisions at the international and domestic levels, however, has given rise to myriad problems. This has increasingly caused states and academics to consider whether regulation may be the preferable approach. Yet despite the extensive sociological and anthropological literature that has conceptualised contract pregnancy as a form of work, the question of whether and how this might translate into a new legal framework remains underexplored. This thesis seeks to bridge this disciplinary gap by investigating the merit of treating surrogates as the employees of their intended parents, therein regulating contract pregnancy through labour law. To do so, it addresses numerous issues through five substantive Chapters: the controversies with marketizing reproductive labour, the current legal landscape, whether surrogacy could really be regulated as labour, what labour law might have to offer, and finally what the challenges might be with this approach to regulation. It draws on a range of secondary sources to answer these, but also integrates analysis of both Californian surrogacy contracts and interviews with industry actors conducted as part of this research. Overall, I argue that particularly for states which do not currently regulate surrogacy – whether because it is prohibited, ignored, or they ascribe to a Free Market approach – labour law has real potential as a pre-existing solution to help ensure that these arrangements operate as ethically as possible. Certainly, exploring this possibility would help to overcome the exceptionalisation of reproductive labour, which this thesis shows is detrimental not only to gestational carriers, but also the coherency of labour law itself.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Defence date: 19 December 2022
Examining Board: Prof. Claire Kilpatrick (European University Institute, EUI Supervisor); Prof. Mathias Siems (European University Institute; Prof. Judy Fudge (McMaster University Canada); Prof. Lizzie Barmes (Queen Mary University of London)
Examining Board: Prof. Claire Kilpatrick (European University Institute, EUI Supervisor); Prof. Mathias Siems (European University Institute; Prof. Judy Fudge (McMaster University Canada); Prof. Lizzie Barmes (Queen Mary University of London)
External Links
Publisher
Version
Chapters 1 'Introduction' and Chapter 4 'Surrogacy: could it really be regulated as labour' draw upon an earlier article: ‘Surrogacy: Time We Recognised it as a Job?’ (2021) published in the Journal of Gender Studies. Chapter 2 'Should surrogacy be marketized?' and Chapter 3 ' The current legal landscape' draw upon ‘Commercial surrogacy : building families outside of family law’, (2022) published in the Hastings Journal of Gender and the Law. Chapters 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 draw upon ‘Labour is labour : what surrogates can learn from the Sex Work Is Work movement' (2022) published in the Journal of law and society.