Does consultation count for corruption? : the causal relations in the EU-28

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDUNLOP, Claire
dc.contributor.authorKAMKHAJI, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorRADAELLI, Claudio M.
dc.contributor.authorTAFFONI, Gaia
dc.contributor.authorWAGEMANN, Claudius
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-12T15:10:41Z
dc.date.available2021-01-12T15:10:41Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionSpecial Issue: In Quest of Legitimacy: The Regulatory State in Transitionen
dc.description.abstractConsultation is a policy instrument geared toward stakeholder engagement in the formulation of primary and secondary legislation. It ensures certain categories of actors can access draft proposals, examine the evidence produced by government or regulators, provide comments and receive feedback. Using an original dataset of consultation design across the EU-28, we examine how variations in combinations of consultation design matter for perceptions of corruption. Using Ostrom’s Institutional Grammar Tool (IGT), we develop expectations about the causal effects of combinations of formal consultation rules together with the condition of social capital, which captures important attributes of the context in which consultation operates. We test our expectations using set-theoretic techniques. Our findings indicate: formal consultation rules are rarely sufficient for mitigating perceptions of corruption, legally prescribed procedures are often replaced by informal rules, and the limited effect of formal consultation rules on perceptions of corruption is due to an incomplete design of the procedures.en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European public policy, 2020, Vol. 27, No. 11, pp. 1718-1741en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13501763.2020.1784984
dc.identifier.endpage1741en
dc.identifier.issue11en
dc.identifier.startpage1718en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/69476
dc.identifier.volume27en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.orcid.uploadtrue*
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of European public policyen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleDoes consultation count for corruption? : the causal relations in the EU-28en
dc.typeArticleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
person.identifier.orcid0009-0001-3971-6765
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5056-5585
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0561-5410
person.identifier.other54125
person.identifier.other26157
person.identifier.other45384
person.identifier.other28394
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd09ceb1b-80dc-40d6-a102-e03b8e8bab57
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcb4e0dbe-2de0-482c-8035-b59d907e47ea
relation.isAuthorOfPublication63e08d87-8ac7-48bf-8eb5-7c60d2abbb98
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd3732bfd-30f0-4e63-9058-715831bf520d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycb4e0dbe-2de0-482c-8035-b59d907e47ea
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Radaelli et al 2020 - Does consultation count for corruption The causal relations in the EU 28.pdf
Size:
2.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full-text in Open Access, Published version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
STG Articles