Open Access
Bounded solidarity? : experimental evidence on cross-national bonding in the EU during the COVID crisis
Loading...
Files
Bounded_solidarity_Experimental_2023.pdf (347.25 KB)
Full-text in Open Access, Published version, OnlineFirst
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0304-4130; 1475-6765
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
European journal of political research, 2024, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 815-838
Cite
OANA, Ioana-Elena, TRUCHLEWSKI, Zbigniew, Bounded solidarity? : experimental evidence on cross-national bonding in the EU during the COVID crisis, European journal of political research, 2024, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 815-838 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/76126
Abstract
Most studies on European solidarity (‘bonding’) during COVID-19 lack a baseline comparison with outside states. We, therefore, cannot say whether European solidarity is universal or geared towards European Union (EU) insiders (‘bounding’). We thus ask whether European solidarity is ‘bounded’, that is, whether it relies on differentiation between European insiders and outsiders. We argue that if existent, bounded solidarity constitutes a long-term and thick basis for institutional building. To explore this ‘bonding–bounding’ dynamic, we use a vignette experiment embedded into an original survey collected in eight European countries (n ∼ 8900), covering all European regions. Our design varies the countries receiving solidarity, and the channels (EU level vs. member state level), policy domains (health vs. economy) and instruments (loans, grants, medical equipment, vaccines) through which solidarity is provided. Regarding bounding, we find that most countries are more solidaristic with EU countries than an outsider, baseline state (Peru), Italy excepted. There is, nonetheless, a strong heterogeneity between countries: France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden mostly want to help themselves and Southern member states, but not Central Eastern European member states, which we show is due to their perceived obstructionism related to the Rule of Law debate. Concerning the nature of solidarity, we find that most respondents prefer solidarity to be channelled through the EU and loans, with evidence suggesting a freeriding mechanism behind this preference. All in all, our results indicate that EU citizens form a distinct community of solidarity which, in line with a Rokkanian understanding of polity formation, plays a key role in political development and consolidation.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online: 11 November 2023
External Links
Publisher
Version
Research Projects
European Commission, 810356
Sponsorship and Funder Information
This study was supported by the SOLID research project (‘Policy Crisis and Crisis Politics, Sovereignty, Solidarity and Identity in the EU Post-2008’) financed by the ERC Synergy Grant Agreement 810356 (ERC-2018-SYG).
This article was published Open Access with the support from the EUI Library through the CRUI - Wiley Transformative Agreement (2020-2023)
This article was published Open Access with the support from the EUI Library through the CRUI - Wiley Transformative Agreement (2020-2023)