Open Access
Into the abyss of standard-setting : an analysis of procedural and substantive guarantees within the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
Loading...
Files
RSCAS_2015_35.pdf (523.39 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1028-3625
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI RSCAS; 2015/35; Global Governance Programme-170; Global Economics
Cite
DELIMATSIS, Panagiotis, Into the abyss of standard-setting : an analysis of procedural and substantive guarantees within the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), EUI RSCAS, 2015/35, Global Governance Programme-170, Global Economics - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/35982
Abstract
Continuous innovation and a growing consumer demand for better and safer products has led to an increase of transnational technical standard-setting in recent years. The World Trade Organization (WTO) exercises a high level of deference towards international standards, requiring their use. However, practice shows that several international standards are adopted through opaque and exclusionary processes. In line with this observation, in its recent US – Tuna II ruling, the Appellate Body adopted a more critical approach regarding international standards and the processes that lead to their adoption. Against this backdrop, this paper focuses on an analysis of the properties and mechanics of international standard-setting processes within the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), discussing procedural and substantive guarantees regarding transparency, openness, deliberation and participation. As the WTO becomes the de facto arbiter of the legitimacy of international standards, much-needed institutional reform in international standard-setting is bound to occur, in line with emerging demands for a more inclusive global legal order.