Contested essential concepts in international relations
Loading...
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Cameron G. THIES (ed.), Handbook of international relations, Cheltenham ; Northampton : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025, pp. 89–105
Cite
BERENSKÖTTER, Felix, GUZZINI, Stefano, Contested essential concepts in international relations, in Cameron G. THIES (ed.), Handbook of international relations, Cheltenham ; Northampton : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025, pp. 89–105 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/92876
Abstract
This chapter explores the notion of “essential concepts” and their contestation with an eye on the field of International Relations (IR). The title plays on W.B. Gallie's famous essay to pursue the argument that a debate over the meaning of an essential concept has analytical, normative and political value. The chapter is structured around three questions: What are concepts? What makes a concept essential? How should we think about contestation? Starting from the position that concepts play a central role in knowledge production and are embedded in (meta-)theoretical logics that shape their meaning, it discusses how contestation plays out in three domains: abstract and normative theoretical knowledge; explanatory and empirical knowledge; and practical knowledge. The chapter concludes with the argument that meaningful contestation requires translation.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published: 17 June 2025
External Links
Publisher
Version
The chapter is a published version of DIIS WP 2024/02