Publication
Open Access

Health union and bioethical union : does Hippocrates require Socrates?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Files
COGHLAN_2020.pdf (222.1 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1867-299X; 2190-8249
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
European journal of risk regulation, 2020, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 766-780
Cite
COGHLAN, Niall, Health union and bioethical union : does Hippocrates require Socrates?, European journal of risk regulation, 2020, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 766-780 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/68961
Abstract
Health Union raises bioethical questions ranging from resource allocation and risk balancing to respect for specific bioethical prohibitions, as an analysis of the European Parliament’s proposal for such a union shows. To date, European Union (EU) health law has succeeded in avoiding or circumscribing such questions, leading to the limited and inconsistent patchwork of EU bioethical provisions we currently have. Can this continue with a Health Union? This article argues that whilst full harmonisation is neither possible nor desirable, Health Union should entail a deepening of bioethical integration. This should occur via a robust legislative process involving citizen panels and ethical advisory group input; if Treaty change occurs, this process could be included in primary law. This is so for three reasons. First, addressing Health Union’s unavoidable bioethical questions coherently and openly reduces the risk of inadequate protection and, conversely, of interest groups “smuggling in” unsupported answers. Second, this will ensure respect for primary law, including Article 2 TEU and Article 3 CFR. Third, EU biolaw offers a middle ground between limited national and weak international human rights law on bioethics, whilst also consolidating European identity.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Published online 21 October 2020
External Links
Version
Research Projects
Sponsorship and Funder Information
This article was published Open Access with the support from the EUI Library through the CRUI - CUP Transformative Agreement (2020-2022)
Collections