Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMICKLITZ, Hans-Wolfgang
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-11T14:58:19Z
dc.date.available2009-12-11T14:58:19Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/12963
dc.description.abstractMy hypothesis, which I try to present in this paper can be broken down into three different affirmations: The ECJ is developing, on the basis of the acquis communautaire, a European Social Framework, not a fully-fledged European Social Model. The ECJ’s Social Model is based on access justice not on social justice. More recently, the ECJ tends to substitute national social models with its own European Social Model.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI LAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2009/19en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectJudicial activismen
dc.subjectsocial modelen
dc.subjectaccess and social justiceen
dc.titleJudicial Activism of the European Court of Justice and the Development of the European. Social Mode in Anti-Discrimination and Consumer Lawen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record