Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKUNNAS, Jan
dc.contributor.authorMYLLYNTAUS, Timo
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-28T15:42:02Z
dc.date.available2010-06-28T15:42:02Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationEcological economics, 2010, Vol. 69, No. 7, pp. 1587-1593en
dc.identifier.issn0921-8009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/14202
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the linkage between per capita GDP and sulphur dioxide emissions for one single country, in this case Finland. The narrow approach together with a combination of a historical and economical approach enables us to cut deeper into the controversial environmental Kuznets curve-hypothesis. We found the main reasons for a downturn in sulphur emissions to be: technological development and anxiety about possible environmental damage and economic costs related to that. It can be discussed whether our results refute the environmental Kuznets curve or just show possible ways in which the environmental Kuznets curve is achieved. Nevertheless our case study casts some serious doubt on the most straightforward assumption coming out from the EKC, that economic growth would automatically solve environmental problems. We claim that the causal connection might also go in an opposite direction: proper environmental standards and conservation comprise a necessary condition for economic growth in the long run.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleAnxiety and technological change : explaining the inverted U-curve of Sulphur Dioxide Emissions in late 20th century Finlanden
dc.typeArticleen


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record