Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCRAMPES, Claude
dc.contributor.authorGLACHANT, Jean-Michel
dc.contributor.authorVON HIRSCHHAUSEN, Christian
dc.contributor.authorLÉVÊQUE, François
dc.contributor.authorNEWBERY, David
dc.contributor.authorPÉREZ-ARRIAGA, Ignacio J.
dc.contributor.authorRANCI, Pippo
dc.contributor.authorSTOFT, Steven
dc.contributor.authorWILLEMS, Bert
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-02T13:01:15Z
dc.date.available2011-02-02T13:01:15Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationThe Electricity Journal, 2009, Vol. 2, No. 7, pp. 81-86en
dc.identifier.issn1040-6190
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/15542
dc.description.abstractOne fairly unique feature of France is that it hosts a large ?eet of nuclear reactors. It is owned by the incumbent, EdF, and provides this 85-percent state-owned enterprise with an economic advantage to compete on price. Moreover, because the energy mix in continental Europe is unbalanced, French nuclear power generation bene?ts from an extra scarcity rent which is likely to last for a long time. Since the opening of the retail market to competition in July 2007, the allocation of this rent and the survival of EdF.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Florence School of Regulation]
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Electricity]
dc.titleWhere the Champsaur commission has got it wrongen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume2
dc.identifier.startpage81
dc.identifier.endpage86
dc.identifier.issue7


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record