dc.contributor.author | KEATING, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-02-02T16:40:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-02-02T16:40:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Citizenship Studies, 2009, 13, 5, 501-513 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-3593 (electronic) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1362-1025 (paper) | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/15563 | |
dc.description.abstract | The social welfare literature has often assumed the existence of a unified, territorial nation-state. This would provide the basis for solidarity and social citizenship, while mobilizing the resources for redistribution. Spatial rescaling and boundary-opening have put the model in question as market-making, market regulation and market-correction have migrated to different levels. States have also widely decentralized. Some fear that this poses a threat to the welfare state by weakening social citizenship and provoking a race to the bottom. Yet solidarity might be re-forged at new levels. The empirical evidence gives little sustenance to the argument for a race to the bottom but rather suggests that social solidarity is being rebuilt at multiple levels. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.title | Social citizenship, solidarity and welfare in regionalized and plurinational states | en |
dc.type | Article | en |