Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSARTOR, Giovanni
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-08T09:44:19Z
dc.date.available2011-03-08T09:44:19Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationArtificial Intelligence and Law, 2009, 17, 4, 253-290en
dc.identifier.issn0924-8463
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/15977
dc.description.abstractI shall argue that software agents can be attributed cognitive states, since their behaviour can be best understood by adopting the intentional stance. These cognitive states are legally relevant when agents are delegated by their users to engage, without users’ review, in choices based on their the agents’ own knowledge. Consequently, both with regard to torts and to contracts, legal rules designed for humans can also be applied to software agents, even though the latter do not have rights and duties of their own. The implications of this approach in different areas of the law are then discussed, in particular with regard to contracts, torts, and personality.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleCognitive Automata and the Law: Electronic Contracting and the Intentionality of Software Agentsen
dc.typeArticleen


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record