| dc.contributor.author | SVETLICINII, Alexandr | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-03-29T12:35:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-03-29T12:35:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | European Law Reporter, 2011, 2, 52-56 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1028-9690 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/16215 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The ECJ’s ruling in Knauf Gips case (C-407/08P) further develops the concept of a «single economic unit» that allows attribution of liability for anti-competitive conduct in cases involving complex corporate structures where the possibility of exercising a decisive influence cannot be always determined on the basis of the controlling shareholdings. The existence of a «single economic unit» can be inferred on the basis of a «consistent body of evidence» requiring case-by-case assessment. | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.title | Who is To Blame? Liability of "Economic Units" for Infringements of EU Competition Law | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
