Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDUNCAN, Fraser
dc.contributor.authorVAN HECKE, Steven
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-19T12:47:23Z
dc.date.available2011-04-19T12:47:23Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European Public Policy, 2008, 15, 3, 432-452
dc.identifier.issn1350-1763
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/16450
dc.description.abstractAs aspects of immigration policy are brought into the competence of the EU, the role of transnational parties in co-ordinating policy choices across national boundaries grows in importance. Yet immigration is often seen as a cross-cutting issue and transnational parties have limited capacity to enforce programmatic uniformity across national member parties. We explore both of these issues by mapping the stances of transnational and national party manifestos on immigration policy at EP elections. We argue that ideology does structure party positions on immigration but that separating immigration control from migrant integration is essential to understanding partisan differences. While Christian Democrat and Conservative parties do not differ significantly from their Socialist equivalents on control issues, Liberal parties are less restrictionist. On integration, both Christian Democrats/Conservatives and Liberals are less multicultural than Socialist and Green parties.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd
dc.subjectelection manifestos
dc.subjectEU
dc.subjectimmigration
dc.subjectpolitical parties
dc.titleImmigration and the Transnational European Centre-Right: A Common Programmatic Response?
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13501760701847705
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.startpage432
dc.identifier.endpage452
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record