dc.contributor.author | YORDANOVA, Nikoleta | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-19T12:49:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-04-19T12:49:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | West European politics, 2011, 34, 1, 97-121 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0140-2382 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/16639 | |
dc.description.abstract | Studies on the European Parliament have largely overlooked the impact of the inter-institutional context on its internal organisation. This paper argues that the stronger legislative powers of the Parliament vis-a-vis the Council of Ministers under the co-decision than under the consultation procedure affect the intra-parliamentary allocation of different types of legislative report. The analysis of the period 2004-07 shows that legislators from the centre-right party group coalition and loyal party group members are privileged in the allocation of co-decision reports. In contrast, legislators with outlying special interests and experts are given systematic access to drafting only consultation reports. The higher competition for co-decision versus consultation reports left unchecked by the formal EP rules has thus been exploited by party group leaders to promote group cohesion and coalition-building, producing clear winners and losers. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | West European politics | en |
dc.title | Inter-institutional rules and division of power in the European Parliament : allocation of consultation and co-decision reports | |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01402382.2011.523547 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 34 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 97 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 121 | |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |