Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBERTOLA, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorBOERI, Tito
dc.contributor.authorCAZES, S.
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-20T14:03:33Z
dc.date.available2011-04-20T14:03:33Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationInternational Labour Review, 2000, 139, 1, 57-+
dc.identifier.issn0020-7780
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/16752
dc.description.abstractThe once clear-cut negative correlation between employment stability and the stringency of employment protection appears to have been lost since the mid-1980s. This may be partly due to the obsolescence of existing measures and rankings of stringency. The authors argue that new indicators are needed to capture the complexity of today's institutional frameworks. They illustrate their argument by analysing the role of judicial enforcement of protection - a crucial, yet hitherto neglected determinant of labour market outcomes. Progress in developing new indicators is urgent, in the interest of providing a more solid basis for decisions on reform of employment protection.
dc.titleEmployment Protection in Industrialized Countries: the Case for New Indicators
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1564-913X.2000.tb00402.x
dc.neeo.contributorBERTOLA|Giuseppe|aut|
dc.neeo.contributorBOERI|Tito|aut|
dc.neeo.contributorCAZES|S.|aut|
dc.identifier.volume139
dc.identifier.startpage57
dc.identifier.endpage+
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record