Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGENSCHEL, Philipp
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-09T15:11:56Z
dc.date.available2011-05-09T15:11:56Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationPolitische Vierteljahresschrift, 1998, 39, 1, 55-+
dc.identifier.issn0032-3470
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/16996
dc.description.abstractMore than 40 years of European integration have led to an habituation of thinking of the European Community as something ideologically neutral, which transcends normal political debate. European issues, it seems, do not fit the structure of the usual right-left ideologicalcontroversy. The only open fault-line in European politics is between advocates of 'more' and those of 'less' integration. The paper explores the potential cognitive and political gains of a change of perspective. It argues that the issue of more or less integration is often not interesting in itself but only to the degree that it influences the content of policies. II further shows that the policies at stake are normally such, that they can be usefully debated in the right-left framework. The decision about the site of policy control - national or European - is often only the guise in which a decision about the redrawing of the boundary between market and state, between the sphere of competitive allocation and the sphere of political coordination, materializes.
dc.titleMarket and State in Europe
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.startpage55
dc.identifier.endpage+
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record