Revisionism in the twentieth century: a bankrupt concept or permanent practice?
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1084-8770
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
European legacy, 2008, 13, 6, 725-741
Cite
GKOTZARIDIS, Evi, Revisionism in the twentieth century: a bankrupt concept or permanent practice?, European legacy, 2008, 13, 6, 725-741 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/17364
Abstract
Written in the wake of a critical incident which the author considers worrying and yet characteristic of the times we live in, this article contends that the conflation heretofore evident between critical historical thinking (revisionism) and negationism is ultimately harmful to the historical discipline since it can serve the interests of the deniers and indirectly grant an argument to radical postmodernists who demote history to a loosely constructed form of personal fiction. On the other hand, it also eschews the belief in historical scholarship as an immiscible category demarcated by impenetrable boundaries, which is habitually associated with empirical positivism. Furthermore, it argues strongly for the introduction of a diachronic perspective in the study of revisionism not only to show the steady process of professionalization of the discipline but to disclose an often neglected or denied aspect: its contribution to the evolution of philosophical thought.