Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorANDERSEN, Stine
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-23T13:40:40Z
dc.date.available2011-05-23T13:40:40Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationCroatian yearbook of European law and policy, 2007, 3, 193-228
dc.identifier.issn1845-5662
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/17441
dc.description.abstractThis article argues that notwithstanding the doctrinal distinction between enforcement and implementing measures, there are effective points of functional overlap between enforcement powers and certain types of implementing tools, which are lawful in that they serve other aims and purposes than enforcement. Since the Commission employs these measures in conjunction with the general infringement procedure or as an alternative with the less discernible aim of ensuring compliance, a comprehensive EC enforcement analysis must take note of them. Potential legal constraints on the Commission in employing these instruments, such as the proportionality principle, are among the questions raised. In addition, the article explores how any perceived misuse may have ramifications for the Commission's ability to have future implementation powers established in secondary law.
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectEuropean Studies
dc.subjectEuropean law
dc.subjectLaw enforcement
dc.subjectEuropean Commission
dc.subjectEU membership
dc.subjectEuropean Union institutions
dc.subjectLegal systems
dc.subjectLegal norms
dc.subjectLegal codes
dc.subjectEurope
dc.titleThe functional overlap of enforcement and implementation tools
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.volume3
dc.identifier.startpage193
dc.identifier.endpage228
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record