Open Access
What is the digital internal market and where the European Union should intervene?
Loading...
Files
RSCAS_2011_33.pdf (121.03 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1028-3625
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI RSCAS; 2011/33; Florence School of Regulation; [Communications and Media]
Cite
DEFRAIGNE, Philippe, DE STREEL, Alexandre, What is the digital internal market and where the European Union should intervene?, EUI RSCAS, 2011/33, Florence School of Regulation, [Communications and Media] - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/17914
Abstract
This paper analyses the digital internal market and when EU intervention is needed to achieve this internal market. It sets legal and economic criteria to determine the appropriate scope of the EU
intervention. It applies these criteria to several case studies and concludes that sometimes the EU
intervention is not justified (choice of regulatory remedies in many national markets, regulation of
mobile termination rate, price control of Next Generation Access networks), whereas in other cases
EU intervention is justified (entry regulation, international roaming, spectrum).
The paper calls for a more open debate of the concept and the means to achieve the digital internal
market. It also submits that EU intervention should focus on the areas where its benefits are the
highest (in particular given the possibilities of economies of scale provided by the technology or the
cross-country externalities), and where its costs are the lowest (in particular given the heterogeneity of
national preferences or the need for regulatory experimentation and competition). Therefore, EU
intervention is more relevant for the content part of digital regulation (such as copyright, privacy,
electronic commerce, dispute resolution) than for the infrastructure part (i.e. the electronic
communications networks and services). In particular, this paper calls the Commission to use with
extreme caution its new power on regulatory remedies, especially in the context of the deployment of
NGA, given the uncertainty on the best form of regulation.