Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFREYBURG, Tina
dc.contributor.authorLAVENEX, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorSCHIMMELFENNIG, Frank
dc.contributor.authorSKRIPKA, Tatiana
dc.contributor.authorWETZEL, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-16T14:23:12Z
dc.date.available2012-02-16T14:23:12Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationDemocratization, 2011, 18, 4, 1026-1054en
dc.identifier.issn1351-0347 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn1743-890X (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/20443
dc.description.abstractThis contribution explores whether and under what conditions functional sectoral cooperation between the EU and the countries of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) promotes democratic governance. In an analysis of four countries (Jordan, Moldova, Morocco, and Ukraine) and three fields of cooperation (competition, environment, and migration policy), we show that country properties such as the degree of political liberalization, membership aspirations, and geographic region do not explain differences in democratic governance. Rather, sectoral conditions such as the codification of democratic governance rules, the institutionalization of functional cooperation, interdependence, and adoption costs matter most for the success of democratic governance promotion. We further reveal a notable discrepancy between adoption and application of democratic governance in the selected ENP countries that has not been remedied in the first five years of the ENP.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleDemocracy Promotion through Functional Cooperation? The case of the European neighbourhood policyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13510347.2011.584738
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record