Trade-Offs and Veto Players: Reforming Pensions in France and Italy
French politics, 2004
RHODES, Martin, NATALI, David, Trade-Offs and Veto Players: Reforming Pensions in France and Italy, French politics, 2004 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/2365
Retrieved from Cadmus, EUI Research Repository
France, like other European countries, has faced growing challenges to its welfare state. Pensions in particular have been at the core of the public debate on recasting its "social model". This article analyses reform processes in the 1990s and early 2000s to explain "how France reforms pensions". While in other Bismarckian welfare states with pay-as-you-go pension systems, reform is usually undertaken via concertation; in France it is formulated by the government alone. Yet even in the French case of state-led policy-making, where the institutional preconditions for corporatism are weak, the political élite needs to adopt a consensual policy making style to overcome trade union veto powers. The Balladur pension reform of 1993 is used to explore this apparent contradiction between a unilateral approach and a consensual style, with an extension of the argument to the 2003 Raffarin reform. A comparison with Italy - a case of consensual, concerted pension policy-making - sheds light on "la voie française" to distributive policy reform.
Cadmus permanent link: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/2365
Files associated with this item
There are no files associated with this item.