Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorROUSSEVA, Ekaterina
dc.contributor.authorMARQUIS, Mel
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-08T16:42:45Z
dc.date.available2012-11-08T16:42:45Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European competition law and practice, 2013, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 32-50en
dc.identifier.issn2041-7764
dc.identifier.issn2041-7772
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/24339
dc.descriptionPublished online: 25 October 2012en
dc.description.abstractThe ECJ's judgment in Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet seems to herald new rigour in the application of Article 102 TFEU to exclusionary pricing practices by dominant firms. The judgment clarifies that the core criterion by which to judge exclusionary conduct under Article 102 is its actual or likely effect on competition, and thereby on consumers. The judgment also signals a decision on the part of the ECJ to embrace fundamental concepts advocated in the Commission's Guidance Paper on exclusionary conduct under Article 102, and in doing so contributes to enhanced legal certainty.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of European competition law and practiceen
dc.titleHell freezes over : a climate change for assessing exclusionary conduct under article 102 TFEUen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jeclap/lps059
dc.identifier.volume4en
dc.identifier.startpage32en
dc.identifier.endpage50en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1en
dc.twitterfalse


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record