Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNETŠUNAJEV, Aleksei
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-05T14:39:38Z
dc.date.available2013-07-05T14:39:38Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Macroeconomics, 2013, Vol. 36, pp. 51-62en
dc.identifier.issn0164-0704
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/27538
dc.descriptionThis is a revised version of the EUI ECO Working Paper; 2012/13.
dc.description.abstractThe paper reconsiders the conflicting results in the debate connected to the effects of technology shocks on hours worked. Given the major dissatisfaction with the just-identifying long-run restrictions, I analyze whether the restrictions used in the literature are consistent with the data. Modeling volatility of shocks using Markov switching structure allows to obtain additional identifying information and perform tests of the restrictions that were just-identifying in classical structural vector autoregressive analysis. Using six ways of identifying technology shocks, I find that not all of them are supported by the data. There is no clear-cut evidence in favor of a positive reaction of hours to technology shocks.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Macroeconomicsen
dc.titleReaction to technology shocks in Markov-switching structural VARs : identification via heteroskedasticityen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmacro.2012.12.005
dc.identifier.volume36en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record