Date: 2013
Type: Working Paper
Racial cues and attitudes toward redistribution : a comparative experimental approach
Working Paper, EUI RSCAS, 2013/59, Global Governance Programme-58, Cultural Pluralism
SOROKA, Stuart, HARELL, Allison, IYENGAR, Shanto, Racial cues and attitudes toward redistribution : a comparative experimental approach, EUI RSCAS, 2013/59, Global Governance Programme-58, Cultural Pluralism - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/27700
Retrieved from Cadmus, EUI Research Repository
Support for welfare in the US is heavily influenced by citizens’ racial attitudes, especially citizens’ attitudes toward Blacks. Indeed, the fact that many Americans think of welfare recipients as poor Blacks (and especially poor Black women) is a common explanation for Americans’ comparatively low support for redistribution cross-nationally. In this study, we extend existing work on how racialized portrayals of recipients affect attitudes toward redistribution. The data for the analysis are drawn from a new and unique online survey experiment, implemented by YouGov with representative samples (n=1200) in each of the US, UK and Canada. Relying on a series of survey vignettes, we manipulate program type (welfare vs. unemployment insurance) as well as the ethno-racial background of recipients (through morphed photos and common ethnicized names). In doing so, we seek to make three specific contributions. First, we test whether support for a means-tested program like welfare is lower than support for contribution-based program like unemployment insurance. Second, we extend the American literature to explore whether there is an anti-Black bias in other countries. Third, we examine whether citizens respond to other minority groups (Asians and Southeast Asians) in a similar manner. Parallel survey designs allows for an unprecedented comparative analysis of the underlying political-psychological sources of support (or lack of support) for redistributive policies across Anglo-Saxon democracies. The paper concludes by considering the implications of this study in light of growing immigrant-driven diversity in North America and Europe.
Cadmus permanent link: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/27700
ISSN: 1028-3625
Series/Number: EUI RSCAS; 2013/59; Global Governance Programme-58; Cultural Pluralism