LAW Working Papers: Recent submissions
Now showing items 1-5 of 753
-
Title:The 'unity of opposites' in the regulation of social media platforms : content moderation between the EUI 'Digital Services Act' and the US First Amendment theories Author(s):MONTI, Matteo Date:2024Type:Working PaperSeries/Number:EUI; LAW; Working Paper; 2024/07Abstract:This paper explores the constitutional theories behind the regulation of content moderation activities of social media platforms across the Atlantic and discusses the effects of a change in the constitutional approach in ...
-
Title:Knowing EU law : how epistemic and ontological commitments shape different understandings of European law and why it matters Author(s):HESSELINK, Martijn Willem Date:2024Type:Working PaperSeries/Number:EUI; LAW; Working Paper; 2024/06Abstract:This paper discusses how epistemic and ontological commitments shape different understandings of European law and why it matters. As the paper demonstrates, many key debates on EU law – and some of the fiercest disagreements ...
-
Title:Reconnecting European law to European societies Author(s):AZOULAI, LoicDate:2024Type:Working PaperSeries/Number:EUI; LAW; Working Paper; 2024/05Abstract:This is a collection of two pieces concerned with the question of the relationship between European law and social reality but within a specific context in which, on the one hand, it is assumed that EU law has produced a ...
-
Title:'Law & peace' : law, in what sense? Author(s):NOUWEN, Sarah Maria Heiltjen Date:2024Type:Working PaperSeries/Number:EUI; LAW; Working Paper; 2024/04Abstract:Literature on ‘law and peace’ has grown substantially. One of the explanations may be the flexible way in which the concept ‘law’ has been used. This entry for the forthcoming Elgar Concise Encyclopedia on Law and Peace, ...
-
Title:A Dane, a German, and a Pole walk into a court : national courts as critics of the European Court of Justice Author(s):SADL, Urska Date:2024Type:Working PaperSeries/Number:EUI; LAW; Working Paper; 2024/03Abstract:National courts can disagree with the judgments of the Court of Justice, objecting to outcomes or/and legal justification. This chapter conceptualizes this disagreement as methodological critique, which can take three ...