Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLEFKOFRIDI, Zoe
dc.contributor.authorGIGER, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorGALLEGO, Alina
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-04T10:41:30Z
dc.date.available2014-03-04T10:41:30Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationJournal of elections public opinion and parties, 2014, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 291-311en
dc.identifier.issn1745-7289
dc.identifier.issn1745-7297
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/30098
dc.descriptionPublished online: 07 Nov 2013en
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we examine whether lack of ideological congruence with the viable party options discourages turnout, and under which conditions. We conceive congruence from the perspective of the individual citizen, and, drawing on policy-based arguments for non-voting, we hypothesize that: having no party in the political menu sharing similar views should especially reduce turnout of citizens holding extremist views and that this effect would be greatest in proportional electoral systems. Relying on data collected by the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES), we show that lack of congruence with the electoral menu reduces extremists’ turnout and does so particularly in PR systems.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Elections, Public Opinion and Partiesen
dc.titleElectoral participation in pursuit of policy representation : ideological congruence and voter turnouten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17457289.2013.846347
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.startpage291
dc.identifier.endpage311
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record