Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSARTOR, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorRUDNIANSKI, Michel
dc.contributor.authorROTOLO, Antonino
dc.contributor.authorRIVERET, Régis
dc.contributor.authorMAYOR, Eunate
dc.identifier.citationCarole HAFNER (ed.), Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Artificial Intelligence and law, New York : ACM, 2009, pp. 108-119en
dc.description.abstractThis contribution introduces a novel approach to study legal interactions, legal professions, and legal institutions, by combining argumentation, game theory and evolution. We consider a population of lawyers, having different postures, who engage in adversarial argumentation with other lawyers, obtaining outcomes according the existing context and their chosen strategies. We examine the resulting games and analyse the evolution of the population.en
dc.titleWhy lawyers are nice (or nasty) : a game-theoretical argumentation exerciseen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.description.versionPublished version of EUI LAW WP 2009/08en

Files associated with this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record