dc.contributor.author | HAKELBERG, Lukas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-18T13:56:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-18T13:56:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1028-3625 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/30414 | |
dc.description.abstract | Theories of tax competition predict that small countries competing with large countries benefit, as they find it relatively easy to substitute revenue lost in a tax cut with revenue gained from incoming foreign tax base. If small countries can only lose from tax co-operation, why are Luxembourg and Austria bound to agree to a revised EU Savings Tax Directive that will oblige them to automatically provide information on foreign account holders’ interest income to residence countries? Putting emphasis on the neglected issue of power, I show that Luxembourg and Austria were first coerced into bilateral agreements on automatic exchange of information by the United States, which then activated a most-favored nation clause contained in the EU Directive on Administrative Co-operation in Tax Matters. As a result, the two countries were under a legal obligation to also extend greater co-operation to EU partners. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | EUI RSCAS | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2014/26 | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | International political economy | en |
dc.subject | Tax competition | en |
dc.subject | EU politics | en |
dc.subject | Power politics | en |
dc.subject | Tax policy | en |
dc.subject | Two-step approach | en |
dc.title | The power politics of international tax cooperation : why Luxembourg and Austria accepted automatic exchange of information on foreign account holders' interest income | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |