Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBOWN, Chad P.
dc.contributor.authorMAVROIDIS, Petros C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-28T13:22:24Z
dc.date.available2014-03-28T13:22:24Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationWorld Trade Review, 2013, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 243-271en
dc.identifier.issn1475-3138
dc.identifier.issn1474-7456
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/30679
dc.description.abstractThe WTO's Appellate Body (AB) dealt with a number of issues for the first time in this Report. Importantly, it discussed the consistency of the European Union (EU) regulation with the multilateral rules on the conditions for deviating from the obligation to calculate individual dumping margins. Although China formally won the argument, the AB may have opened the door to treat China as a nonmarket economy (NME) even beyond 2016 when China's NME status was thought to expire under the terms of China's 2001 WTO Accession Protocol. The AB further dealt with numerous other issues ranging from statistical sampling to the treatment of confidential information. In handling its investigation, the EU authorities made a number of questionable decisions regarding the collection of information, and this aspect of the process was central to China's legal challenges.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Trade Reviewen
dc.titleOne (firm) is not enough : a legal-economic analysis of EC-fastenersen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1474745612000547
dc.identifier.volume12en
dc.identifier.startpage243en
dc.identifier.endpage271en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record