Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFREIRE, Andre
dc.contributor.authorSANTANA PEREIRA, José
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T18:00:02Z
dc.date.available2014-12-19T18:00:02Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationElectoral studies, 2012, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 506-512
dc.identifier.issn0261-3794
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/33960
dc.description.abstractThis article tests the economic voting hypothesis in Portugal during the three most recent first-order elections (2002, 2005, 2009), trying to make sense of the multiplicity of choices in the Portuguese party system. We observed that positive sociotropic perceptions increase the probability to vote for the incumbent, even when we control for long-term factors of vote choice; egotropic effects are weaker. Negative economic perceptions not only lead to a higher probability to vote for the major opposition party, but, in some cases, increase the probabilities to vote for small parties or to refrain from voting. Sociotropic effects are actually quite constant in this timeframe, but their strength to explain the vote is lower than that of ideology and (before 2009) religiosity. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoEn
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofElectoral studies
dc.subjectEconomic voting
dc.subjectElections
dc.subjectPortugal
dc.subjectSociotropic perceptions
dc.subjectMultiparty systems
dc.subjectPolitical context
dc.subjectelections
dc.subjectvote
dc.subjectresponsibility
dc.subjectnations
dc.subjecteurope
dc.subjecttime
dc.titleEconomic voting in Portugal, 2002-2009
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.electstud.2012.02.006
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.startpage506
dc.identifier.endpage512
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record