Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDE GROOF, Emmanuel
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-28T15:19:02Z
dc.date.available2015-09-28T15:19:02Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/37095
dc.description.abstractIn the post-Cold-War era domestic interim governance (‘DIG’) has become a matter of international interest. DIG is observed by provisional governments, transitional councils, etc. (‘domestic transitional authorities’) in countries said to be in transition. The so-called international community increasingly relies on DIG, which has become a recurrent politico-legal reality today. This paper unveils the reasons behind the success of DIG, observes how DIG is increasingly being internationalized, questions the legal rationales that may be invoked in support of DIG, and ends with discussing the paradoxes underlying DIG. The paper argues that a comprehensive analysis of how international law applies to transitions –a ius in interregno– should be undertaken in order to deconstruct these paradoxes from a legal perspective, and guards against some traps to be avoided in the elaboration of such a ius in interregno.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI LAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2015/38en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectDomestic interim governanceen
dc.subjectStates in transitionen
dc.subjectPeace-through-transition paradigmen
dc.subjectProxy interim governanceen
dc.subjectIus in interregnoen
dc.titleThe need for a ius in interregno : why international law should focus more on domestic interim governanceen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record