dc.contributor.author | LENK, Hannes | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-21T13:47:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-21T13:47:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | European journal of legal studies, 2015, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 6-20 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1973-2937 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/38604 | |
dc.description.abstract | There have long been demands for more coherence in EU external action. The Lisbon Treaty has introduced important institutional changes in this respect. However, coherence – in the broad sense of a positive process that is focused on establishing synergies between various policy fields and actors – is still largely lacking for an EU foreign investment policy. An institutional bifurcation of different Directorates-General puts fuel to the fire of a conceptual confusion of intra-EU and extra-EU investment agreements. As a consequence, overarching concerns such as compatibility with the principle of autonomy or effects of investor-state arbitration on the internal market are missing a coherent approach. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | European journal of legal studies | en |
dc.relation.uri | https://ejls.eui.eu/ | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.subject | BITs | en |
dc.subject | Coherence | en |
dc.subject | Intra-EU | en |
dc.subject | Extra-EU | en |
dc.subject | EU foreign investment policy | en |
dc.title | Challenging the notion of coherence in EU foreign investment policy | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | en |
dc.identifier.startpage | 6 | en |
dc.identifier.endpage | 20 | en |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en |