Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLENK, Hannes
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-21T13:47:03Z
dc.date.available2016-01-21T13:47:03Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of legal studies, 2015, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 6-20en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/38604
dc.description.abstractThere have long been demands for more coherence in EU external action. The Lisbon Treaty has introduced important institutional changes in this respect. However, coherence – in the broad sense of a positive process that is focused on establishing synergies between various policy fields and actors – is still largely lacking for an EU foreign investment policy. An institutional bifurcation of different Directorates-General puts fuel to the fire of a conceptual confusion of intra-EU and extra-EU investment agreements. As a consequence, overarching concerns such as compatibility with the principle of autonomy or effects of investor-state arbitration on the internal market are missing a coherent approach.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of legal studiesen
dc.relation.urihttps://ejls.eui.eu/en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectBITsen
dc.subjectCoherenceen
dc.subjectIntra-EUen
dc.subjectExtra-EUen
dc.subjectEU foreign investment policyen
dc.titleChallenging the notion of coherence in EU foreign investment policyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume8en
dc.identifier.startpage6en
dc.identifier.endpage20en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record